Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Houston Police Officer wants apology from TSA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2006, 8:49 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southwest CT
Programs: DL Diamond and Million Miler, Marriott Titanium Elite, Hertz Pres Circle
Posts: 7,618
Houston Police Officer wants apology from TSA

Here's the link to the story in today's Houston Chronicle. I came across it while sitting here in the Presidents Club waiting for my delayed flight back home to LGA.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4253267.html
tonypct is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 8:59 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by tonypct
Here's the link to the story in today's Houston Chronicle. I came across it while sitting here in the Presidents Club waiting for my delayed flight back home to LGA.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4253267.html
Yes, I remember we debated this story heavily a few months back. A lot of us didn't see an issue with how the LEO handled the situation and felt bad he got left holding the bag.

The FBI has vindicated him, and now apparently his department has too. I hope he can take TSA to the cleaners.

And I'm not surprised that TSA awarded its screeners for incompetence (either for "making" a Big Catch® or for following stupid and incompetent protocols). Seems like par for the course.
Superguy is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 9:04 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Orlando
Programs: DL 4MM/PM, UA 1MM/Gold, AA Paper
Posts: 1,386
Do the TSA ever accept responsibility for anything? I guess the correct answer is NO.
OrlandoFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 10:03 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Originally Posted by OrlandoFlyer
Do the TSA ever accept responsibility for anything?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!

(deep breath)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA

Aw man, the TSA taking responsibility....that's a good one.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 10:06 am
  #5  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,955
Originally Posted by OrlandoFlyer
Do the TSA ever accept responsibility for anything? I guess the correct answer is NO.
TSA is to responsibility as vampire is to crucifix.
Spiff is online now  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 10:17 am
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
Hmm, this slipped my radar.

Does anyone know what became of Mr. Batainah?
PhlyingRPh is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 10:42 am
  #7  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,179
Originally Posted by PhlyingRPh
Hmm, this slipped my radar.

Does anyone know what became of Mr. Batainah?
The article states that the FBI interviewed him in Atlanta, where he'd gone to take a new job, and found no reason for concern or suspicion.
exerda is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 10:50 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,956
Here is the link to the prior thread.

First, the person that deserves an apology even more is the passenger, Mohamed Ahwar Bataineh, a Jordanian living legally in Houston. He lost his job, the FBI took his laptop (not sure when or if he has received it back) and he is on the terrorist list and the SSSS list now.

"I am very, very upset," Reece said. "I totally feel like I've been done an injustice." He also wants to know why the TSA officials he holds responsible for the incident were rewarded with a day off and a TSA pen.
The TSO's receive a day off and a pen for messing up the lives of Officer Reece and the passenger? This should not happen.

"They were totally responsible for what happened at that checkpoint," Reece said. "These people [TSA] clearly don't know what they are doing."
From all appearances, this is very true.

There will be no apology from the TSA. Spokeswoman Andrea McCauley said neither the TSA nor the supervisor at the checkpoint, Clarice Gaines, filed a complaint against Reece.

"Simply stated, we never accused him of wrongdoing," McCauley said.

Chad Hoffman, a police-union attorney representing Reece, said a federal agency passed information about the incident to police officials, which is tantamount to making a formal complaint. He did not know which federal agency informed police.

A TSA report obtained by the Houston Chronicle appears to blame Reece for the incident.
Has the TSA ever apologized for any missteps?

So how did the investigation start against the LEO if the TSA did not say anything? The TSA's statement that it never accused Reece of "wrongdoing" may be semantics.

"The shoes had been tampered with and there were all the components of (a bomb) except the explosive itself," according to the report.
Don't I then have all the components of a bomb except the explosive itself whenever I carry my laptop and charger? And how about every passenger that carries on their cell phone and charger? A nine-volt battery, some miscellaneous wire and an alarm clock do not make a bomb. The explosive material is what is the most important. This is a totally ludicrous quote from the TSA.

Instead of detaining Bataineh or calling the FBI as they could have and should have done according to security officials, a TSA official asked Reece to investigate.

The report blamed Reece, but police officials say their officers are not authorized to prevent people from boarding airliners.

U.S. Rep. Gene Green sided with police, saying the TSA should have stopped Bataineh from entering the boarding area.
I am now very confused over who has the power to detain at a checkpoint. I've read that the TSA does not have that power and so that is why the LEO is called. Now we have security officials and a congressman that say otherwise. And on top of that, police officials say their officers can't stop someone from boarding. Is this all semantics or does the left foot not know what the right foot is doing?

And the TSO's expect us to know all the rules?
ND Sol is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 11:01 am
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
Originally Posted by ND Sol
Here is the link to the prior thread.

First, the person that deserves an apology even more is the passenger, Mohamed Ahwar Bataineh, a Jordanian living legally in Houston. He lost his job, the FBI took his laptop (not sure when or if he has received it back) and he is on the terrorist list and the SSSS list now.
I agree. I don't really care about the HPD officer. He has his colleagues and his department to back him up and likely this incident is merely a blip in his life. I am more concerned about the welfare of Mr. Batainah who has had his life turned upside down.
PhlyingRPh is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 11:02 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Officer Reece for Attorney General!
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 11:35 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: BOS
Posts: 3,534
Bataineh shook his head, but an X-ray machine operator detected a laptop and alarm clock with a nine-volt battery taped to it.

Ok so if I happen to be travelling with my battery powered alarm clock I better leave the batteries inside instead of cleverly taping them to the clock so it doesn't USE UP THE BATTERY WHILE TRAVELLING. This is utterly stupid. Have we all gone so insane that the simple act of doing something SMART while travelling with battery powered equipment now equates to "bomb-making material"?

There will be no apology from the TSA. Spokeswoman Andrea McCauley said neither the TSA nor the supervisor at the checkpoint, Clarice Gaines, filed a complaint against Reece.

So much ****. And just who made the complaint to his department? First accuse a local officer, then hide behind a bureaucracy that won't even take responsibility for the complaint it filed, then just outright deny that it had made the complaint.
Lurker1999 is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 11:41 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: just above cargo
Posts: 2,072
"Reece found no reason to detain Bataineh and allowed him to enter the boarding area over the protests of screeners, according to the report."

Just out of interest, would I be right in thinking that even if the police officer didn't find probable cause to arrest the passenger for any offense, the TSA could have prevented him from flying if they genuinely believed there was a security risk? The airport (and the plane) is private property and the officer can't give him permission to enter - he can only prevent him by arresting/detaining him if there's a good reason, surely?

Or do I have it backwards?
secretbunnyboy is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 11:51 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
Who the @!#$%*#$ gets rewarded with a pen for doing a good job?

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 11:57 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: BOS and vicinity
Programs: Former UA 1P
Posts: 3,725
Originally Posted by secretbunnyboy
Just out of interest, would I be right in thinking that even if the police officer didn't find probable cause to arrest the passenger for any offense, the TSA could have prevented him from flying if they genuinely believed there was a security risk? The airport (and the plane) is private property and the officer can't give him permission to enter - he can only prevent him by arresting/detaining him if there's a good reason, surely?

Or do I have it backwards?
If the LEO doesn't have cause to arrest, my guess is that he can no longer detain the passenger or restrict his movements. IMO this LEO and his department should be commended (maybe even given a medal!) for recognizing this basic reality.

I suspect that the TSA can't prevent a screened passenger who has been cleared of all alarms from proceding into the sterile area. Previous posts on FT have indicated that the airline GSC can deny passage, but he would have no motivation to do so here. Why would you deny passage to a paying customer who had no prohibited items and was not acting drunk/berzerk?

It sounds very much to me like TSA freaked out and wanted aid from law enforcement in executing punishment/retaliation against this passenger. TSA didn't get their help and thus made a fuss. That TSA concluded that an alarm clock and battery were "all the components of a bomb except the explosives" is very telling about their attitude. (BTW, a very good reason to tape the battery to your alarm clock while traveling is to prevent the alarm from going off, which can be annoying or even disturbing if it happens where others hear beeping coming from a bag.)

TSA should grow a backbone (or male reproductive parts), apologize to this passenger, remove him from the SSSS list, and see to his that all of his property is returned with compensation, and apologie to the LEO and his department for their inappropriate actions.
studentff is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2006, 12:03 pm
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
Originally Posted by mikeef
Who the @!#$%*#$ gets rewarded with a pen for doing a good job?

Mike
Well, the pen is mightier than the sword. It has inspirational value. Anyway, a $5 Mont Blanc lookalike w/ TSA logo is better than a set of golf clubs, especially as you and I are paying for it, right?
PhlyingRPh is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.