Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

FA's throw boiling water on Air Mauritania hijacker

FA's throw boiling water on Air Mauritania hijacker

Old Feb 16, 2007, 8:44 am
  #1  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Under an ORD approach path
Programs: DL PM, MM. Coffee isn't a drug, it's a vitamin.
Posts: 12,935
FA's throw boiling water on Air Mauritania hijacker

A hijacker tried to force an Air Mauritania plane to go to France

The pilot diverted to the Canary islands, and announced in French on the PA (since he'd deterimined the hijacker didn't speak French) that he'd do a hard breaking and accelleration upon touchdown; the pax braced themselves but the hijacker didn't. He fell, FA's splashed him with boiling water and the pax jumped the guy and restrained him.

Another hijacking prevented NOT by airport security but by pax and crew. One more reason that it makes no sense to take away our pocket knifes and shoes; the bad guys will get stuff on board anyway, let the pax carry things to use to fight back.

BTW, in the wake of this I bet the TSA bans hot coffee in the galleys, since al Qaeda could use that hot water to attack us, just like the FA's used it on the idiot.

Oh, and the pilots name is Ahmedou Mohamed Lemine- sounds like a Moslem male- we'd better profile him just in case. <NOT>
Gargoyle is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 8:47 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Crew smarts and passenger revolt are things the TSA doesn't want you to think that could happen. It threatens the TSA's existence.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 9:31 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RTP
Programs: AA(EXP), BA, Hilton, Starwood
Posts: 1,250
Well, this took place outside the US on a plane travelling between two foreign coutries, so I dare say the TSA had little to do with it one way or another, no matter how central they are to anyone's litany of domestic gripes.

Some of the things that struck me about how lucky these pax were:

1> The pilot has a language he can speak around the hijacker. Who LETS him.

2> The FA's rearrange the women/kids into the back and the men up front. And the hijacker LETS them.

3> After the announcement and move the hijacker does NOT notice the PAX bracing themselves AND continues to stand in the aisle - near the men who moved up front.

4> ... is a 7mm handgun? Like a 38 or something?

I also noticed that the guy got TWO handguns onto the airplane. Wonder how he was able to do that first try (gotta figure getting caught doing that would have led to consequences) in their security environment.
TierFlyer is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 10:06 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,700
Originally Posted by Gargoyle
Oh, and the pilots name is Ahmedou Mohamed Lemine- sounds like a Moslem male- we'd better profile him just in case. <NOT>
Actually, since there seems to be a pattern here, the only responsible thing to do is to profile.

Demographics PLUS behavior.

Disagree?
Mikey likes it is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 10:21 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Originally Posted by Mikey likes it
Disagree?
Yes.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 10:25 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Originally Posted by TierFlyer
Well, this took place outside the US on a plane travelling between two foreign coutries, so I dare say the TSA had little to do with it one way or another, no matter how central they are to anyone's litany of domestic gripes.
The liquid thing in London also took place outside the US. We still managed to interfere with Scotland Yard's case.

My point was to demonstrate how crew smarts and passenger rebellion can happen anywhere, and the TSA doesn't want you to think that way.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 10:33 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: Choice Hotels/FFOCUS
Posts: 7,256
Originally Posted by LessO2
The liquid thing in London also took place outside the US. We still managed to interfere with Scotland Yard's case.

My point was to demonstrate how crew smarts and passenger rebellion can happen anywhere, and the TSA doesn't want you to think that way.
Very well said.
coachrowsey is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 10:34 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
IHG Contributor BadgeMarriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RSW
Programs: Delta - Silver; UA - Silver; HHonors - Diamond; IHG - Spire Ambassador; Marriott Bonvoy - Titanium
Posts: 14,184
Originally Posted by LessO2
The liquid thing in London also took place outside the US. We still managed to interfere with Scotland Yard's case.

My point was to demonstrate how crew smarts and passenger rebellion can happen anywhere, and the TSA doesn't want you to think that way.
The interference had to do with the fact that they were specifically planning on targeting a U.S. - bound flight, no?

I guess I must be living in a delusional world (as opposed to say ... the Executive Branch) where any sign of a hijacking would result in a knock to the noggin with the nearest laptop, or two?
Points Scrounger is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 10:42 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Under an ORD approach path
Programs: DL PM, MM. Coffee isn't a drug, it's a vitamin.
Posts: 12,935
Originally Posted by Mikey likes it
Actually, since there seems to be a pattern here, the only responsible thing to do is to profile.
Pattern? A Moslem male pilot rallied the pax (and I'm sure many of them were also Moslem males) to thwart a hijacking.

The plane was Mauritanian. Mauritania has a 99.84% Moslem population. (source: wikipedia). So, maybe they should just profile 99.84% of their passengers and crew?

By the way, please tell me what a Moslem looks like. I'm sure they all look alike and are easy to profile. (I have on a number of times been asked in Arabic by Palestinians if I was Arab. If they can't tell, how do you expect the TSA to be able to tell? You think a hijacker will have honest ID and will not lie?)
Gargoyle is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 11:31 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Programs: Skymiles SM
Posts: 305
Originally Posted by Mikey likes it
Actually, since there seems to be a pattern here, the only responsible thing to do is to profile.

Demographics PLUS behavior.

Disagree?

Oh $hit, someone with a Moslem name was pilotting the plane and saved all the pax.
Better make sure he cant fly airplanes anymore.
Fishie is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 12:33 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RTP
Programs: AA(EXP), BA, Hilton, Starwood
Posts: 1,250
Originally Posted by LessO2
My point was to demonstrate how crew smarts and passenger rebellion can happen anywhere, and the TSA doesn't want you to think that way.
Really? Can you point to a cite, link, or responsible article about that? It seems a farfetched hypothesis.....
TierFlyer is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 12:34 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RTP
Programs: AA(EXP), BA, Hilton, Starwood
Posts: 1,250
Originally Posted by Gargoyle
Pattern? A Moslem male pilot rallied the pax (and I'm sure many of them were also Moslem males) to thwart a hijacking.
Dude, I am pretty sure that was sarcasm.
TierFlyer is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 1:07 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Under an ORD approach path
Programs: DL PM, MM. Coffee isn't a drug, it's a vitamin.
Posts: 12,935
Originally Posted by TierFlyer
Dude, I am pretty sure that was sarcasm.
That's where the smilies, tacky though they can be, are helpful. With on-line discussions we miss the intonation, body language cues, etc, so it's often hard to tell if someone is serious, sarcastic, subtle, or clueless.
Gargoyle is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 1:34 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Sunshine State
Programs: Deltaworst Peon Level, TSA "Layer 21 Club", NW WP RIP
Posts: 11,370
Originally Posted by Gargoyle
BTW, in the wake of this I bet the TSA bans hot coffee in the galleys, since al Qaeda could use that hot water to attack us, just like the FA's used it on the idiot.
Unfortunately TSA and the EU will use this to ban water and all liquids on all flights. Who cares, as long as less than 0.01% of the pax or crew die from dehydration per flying hour, they will consider it a worthwhile trade off for Safety. Future "Retake the Plane" attempts will require placing an empty coffeepot in the lav with a sign "Please give generously and soon, we have an armed hijacker that needs scalding." That is, only untill they ban those "improvised coffeepot weapons".
Flaflyer is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2007, 1:49 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,320
Originally Posted by TierFlyer
Well, this took place outside the US on a plane travelling between two foreign coutries, so I dare say the TSA had little to do with it one way or another, no matter how central they are to anyone's litany of domestic gripes.

Some of the things that struck me about how lucky these pax were:

1> The pilot has a language he can speak around the hijacker. Who LETS him.

2> The FA's rearrange the women/kids into the back and the men up front. And the hijacker LETS them.

3> After the announcement and move the hijacker does NOT notice the PAX bracing themselves AND continues to stand in the aisle - near the men who moved up front.
You're assuming hijackers are intelligent. Most aren't very intelligent--it's a crime you so often don't get away from.
Loren Pechtel is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.