Community
Wiki Posts
Search

LH and Brazil's TAM to partner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2007, 7:57 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MUC (home), DUS (office), XXX (customer)
Programs: LH, AB, SPG, CC, Sixt, EC
Posts: 6,334
Originally Posted by andre1970
Not sure I got it. Care to elaborate?
I don't really see a huge popularity to fly to Brasil, meaning I don't see a higher demand than weeks ago. But suddenly the number of flights to Sao Paulo increased by a lot, so why shouldn't prices drop?
supermasterphil is offline  
Old May 26, 2007, 5:13 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A Sight For Roll Eyes
Programs: :enrolleyes:+, :drôleyes:
Posts: 5,461
Originally Posted by supermasterphil
I don't really see a huge popularity to fly to Brasil, meaning I don't see a higher demand than weeks ago. But suddenly the number of flights to Sao Paulo increased by a lot, so why shouldn't prices drop?
I guess, because prices do not just fall automatically and ...on own initiative: Airlines manipulate them. And chances are that they're not very eager to push them downwards .

My Econ 101 (gave me hell to pass, y'all know... ) tells me that what is more likely to contribute to a decline in prices is competition, not just an increase in supply (if any). Alas, if I'm reading the news correctly, this is not about intensified competition between LH and TAM, but pretty much about the opposite, right? Much worse, when there is no increase in supply to boot. Whatever was the number of seats before, it should remain the same, by and large: LH seats+TAM seats. What changes however, is the degree of coordination between formerly independent decision centers.

Last edited by andre1970; May 27, 2007 at 5:25 am
andre1970 is offline  
Old May 26, 2007, 5:19 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ZRH, exFRA/HD, ex-SFO, ex-MUC, ex-GRU
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 674
It's not that Germans want to go to Brazil or vice-versa.
After Varig went belly up, there are 7,000 less seats in international flights from and to Brazil every day. So all other companies could afford to increase prices, because the demand for them became much higher.

Also, since the USA started requiring a Visa for passengers only connecting in the country, Brazilian and SA folks in general avoid the USA route when going to Asia. It's much less trouble to connect anywhere in Europe instead, where they don't need a visa.
The Japanese community in São Paulo (GRU) is huge, by the way.
MariaSF is offline  
Old May 27, 2007, 3:19 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: AMS>GRU/GIG
Programs: KL/AF Platinum
Posts: 1,417
It's not that Germans want to go to Brazil or vice-versa.
After Varig went belly up, there are 7,000 less seats in international flights from and to Brazil every day. So all other companies could afford to increase prices, because the demand for them became much higher.


Total seat capacity/offered now is higher than at the pre-VARIG times. Since RG went down, LH introduced MUC-GRU, routed the FRA-EZE flight via GRU and increased frequencies of LX now 6 x week. RG itself is operating FRA twice daily, while Condor operates SSA in Northeast Brazil.

Demand for Brazil flights has increased strongly, especially high-yield traffic. Ahead bookings are very healthy.


Also, since the USA started requiring a Visa for passengers only connecting in the country, Brazilian and SA folks in general avoid the USA route when going to Asia. It's much less trouble to connect anywhere in Europe instead, where they don't need a visa.
The Japanese community in São Paulo (GRU) is huge, by the way.


Indeed, but to avoid the US transit, many pax are flying via Canada Air Canada or South Africa with SA. In addition, Air China started to operate PEK-GRU (showing strong loads), while JAL also increased frequencies NRT-GRU. Emirates will start DXB-GRU in October, and will also take care of many pax connecting to Asia.

Increased capacity in GRU has been very high therefore more seats offered now than during RG times. TAM has also been growing amazingly, operating now 3 daily to CDG,+ daily to LHR and MXP - FRA will be next while aircraft dont stop arriving...

As for Europe Brazil, *A partner TAP never-ending expansion is bringing the airline 12 weekly to GIG, 11 weekly to GIG, and LIS-BSB service will start in June opening a new gateway to the already established daily SSA, NAT, FOR, REC services. AF will introduce its second daily CDG-GIG in October, while its twice daily CDG-GRU are consolidaded.

Rgs,
hardiwv is offline  
Old May 27, 2007, 5:28 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SZG
Posts: 3,936
Originally Posted by hardiwv
It's not that Germans want to go to Brazil or vice-versa.
After Varig went belly up, there are 7,000 less seats in international flights from and to Brazil every day. So all other companies could afford to increase prices, because the demand for them became much higher.


Total seat capacity/offered now is higher than at the pre-VARIG times. Since RG went down, LH introduced MUC-GRU, routed the FRA-EZE flight via GRU and increased frequencies of LX now 6 x week. RG itself is operating FRA twice daily, while Condor operates SSA in Northeast Brazil.

Demand for Brazil flights has increased strongly, especially high-yield traffic. Ahead bookings are very healthy.


Also, since the USA started requiring a Visa for passengers only connecting in the country, Brazilian and SA folks in general avoid the USA route when going to Asia. It's much less trouble to connect anywhere in Europe instead, where they don't need a visa.
The Japanese community in São Paulo (GRU) is huge, by the way.


Indeed, but to avoid the US transit, many pax are flying via Canada Air Canada or South Africa with SA. In addition, Air China started to operate PEK-GRU (showing strong loads), while JAL also increased frequencies NRT-GRU. Emirates will start DXB-GRU in October, and will also take care of many pax connecting to Asia.

Increased capacity in GRU has been very high therefore more seats offered now than during RG times. TAM has also been growing amazingly, operating now 3 daily to CDG,+ daily to LHR and MXP - FRA will be next while aircraft dont stop arriving...

As for Europe Brazil, *A partner TAP never-ending expansion is bringing the airline 12 weekly to GIG, 11 weekly to GIG, and LIS-BSB service will start in June opening a new gateway to the already established daily SSA, NAT, FOR, REC services. AF will introduce its second daily CDG-GIG in October, while its twice daily CDG-GRU are consolidaded.

Rgs,
have you ever heard of the quote button?! this is really hard to read...
sentom is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2007, 4:40 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Programs: mainly BA (Gold), UA
Posts: 85
Originally Posted by ORDSteve
Last update: 5/21/2007 2:14:42 PM
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
Tam SA (TAM) and Lufthansa signed a memorandum of understanding in which they intend to examine various forms of cooperation, including the implementation of codesharing on domestic and international routes.
The companies may also optimize flight schedules and link their frequent flyer programs.
Domestic codeshares on TAM, anyone?
madhatter is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2007, 5:25 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MUC (home), DUS (office), XXX (customer)
Programs: LH, AB, SPG, CC, Sixt, EC
Posts: 6,334
Originally Posted by madhatter
Domestic codeshares on TAM, anyone?
Do you really think this is an appropriate post?
supermasterphil is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2007, 5:57 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Programs: mainly BA (Gold), UA
Posts: 85
Originally Posted by supermasterphil
Do you really think this is an appropriate post?
Of course I do! Why would you think I'd post if I thought otherwise?

As a plus, it is ON topic. Why would LH cooperate in codeshhares with airlines that operate from highly dangerous airports? You know, this is the problem with all thhose airlines down there and TAM just happens to be the largest.
madhatter is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2007, 6:14 am
  #24  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Aman Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF Lifetime SG, LH HON, OZ Lifetime Diamond +, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 14,372
Originally Posted by supermasterphil
Do you really think this is an appropriate post?
Let's say the style is a bit questionable. At least I would have worded it a differently after such an event.
But you can learn from this tradgedy that any airline needs to carfully chose their partners. And in some cases, it is not only about the partner airline, it can be about the state of the civial aviation system of an entire nation.
DownUnderFlyer is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2007, 6:23 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MUC (home), DUS (office), XXX (customer)
Programs: LH, AB, SPG, CC, Sixt, EC
Posts: 6,334
Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer
Let's say the style is a bit questionable. At least I would have worded it a differently after such an event.
But you can learn from this tradgedy that any airline needs to carfully chose their partners. And in some cases, it is not only about the partner airline, it can be about the state of the civial aviation system of an entire nation.
From what I read, it is very obvious that the runway was in the worst shape and an incident like that happened just recently with a smaller plane. So the problem was more about the airport than about the a/c, the airline or their pilots (from what we know by now)

On the other hand, these pilots or the airline could have known how bad it is and they could have refused to land under conditions like that (aquaplaning due to heavy rain) if they would have been more responsible. And if comes to that point, yes, airlines should be more careful about the partners they choose.

I don't want to say that something like that couldn't happen to other airlines
supermasterphil is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2007, 7:39 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: MHG/DTM
Posts: 336
>>>Domestic codeshares on TAM, anyone?

>>>any airline needs to carfully chose their partners.

Can you at least wait until the cause is known until you conclude whether TAM are a suitable LH partner or not?

I on't remember anyone voicing similar concerns when Luxair's THF-LUX crashed five years ago, and that flight even bore an LH flight number...
Airsicknessbag is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2007, 10:25 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Jersey Shore
Programs: UA *G MM, AA G MM
Posts: 1,866
Originally Posted by madhatter
You know, this is the problem with all thhose airlines down there
cl.lurker is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2007, 11:07 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 739
Originally Posted by madhatter
Of course I do! Why would you think I'd post if I thought otherwise?

As a plus, it is ON topic. Why would LH cooperate in codeshhares with airlines that operate from highly dangerous airports? You know, this is the problem with all thhose airlines down there and TAM just happens to be the largest.
Absolutely. Because LH has never had an accident. The world's very first 747 crash was somebody completely different. And because LH's other partners have never ever crashed either and operate from perfectly safe European airports. SK 686 in LIN was a perfect example of this....
Bob'sYourUncle is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2007, 11:11 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto (YYZ)
Posts: 6,279
Originally Posted by madhatter
You know, this is the problem with all thhose airlines down there and TAM just happens to be the largest.
I don't agree with your term "those airlines"

Actually TAM has an excellent reputation in Brazil and throughout South America. TAM was considered superior to Varig in customer service and cabin comfort. They also had a more modern fleet than Varig.

I would love to see TAM enter Star Alliance and code share with LH as South America is now the week link in the Star network.
imverge is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2007, 11:12 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 739
Oh, and I almost forgot, an LH plane has never suffered aquaplaning when landing on a wet runway. And certainly not in WAW.
Bob'sYourUncle is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.