Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Boom $5k return - 3.4 hours LHR/JFK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 1:18 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Programs: QRPC Platinum, KFEG
Posts: 1,014
Boom $5k return - 3.4 hours LHR/JFK

Slightly off-topic but seeing this futuristic project is kind of a (beloved?) Concorde replacement on possibly the only viable route for this kind of value proposition.

(LAX-SYD and SFO-TYO or other routes they are proposing)

http://boom.aero/
AAtticus is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 1:41 pm
  #2  
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Devon/UK
Programs: BA Blue :(
Posts: 242
Only $5000 return, don't believe that.
BlackSkyuk is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 1:49 pm
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atherton, CA
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP; Owner, Green Bay Packers
Posts: 21,687
Agree, it would be nice, but I doubt they could do it for that price.
Doc Savage is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 1:52 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,503
Well, not as OT as you think if Boom are the aircraft manufacturer. They still need airlines like BA to order them.

I might be misunderstanding the proposition though - given they're saying this will be for 'business class prices'. It would suggest they'll be the airline too?

Just like Virgin Galactic, I won't hold my breath. Of course it would be great if it came to anything.
London_traveller is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 2:37 pm
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,444
...and not nearly as ugly as most of the other recent flights of fancy into SS territory.
LondonElite is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 2:49 pm
  #6  
10 Countries Visited10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 223
Good luck to them, they're going to need billions $
gingeola is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 3:51 pm
  #7  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL (for now) and Lifetime Gold, Marriott fan thanks to Bonvoy Moments
Posts: 5,138
Originally Posted by gingeola
Good luck to them, they're going to need billions $
Ah, but in this brave new world regulation is for stuffy old companies that don't innovate like the new kids on the block. After all, what could possibly go wrong...

(I've seen this attitude in some financial services start-ups and there's a disturbing naivety about them)

How many 'bet the company' efforts have there been in aviation in recent years from Boeing (Dreamliner?), Airbus (A380?) and Bombardier (C-series?), Mitsubishi (MRJ?), Rolls Royce, etc.
lorcancoyle is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 4:10 pm
  #8  
30 Countries Visited1M10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AVP & PEK
Programs: UA 1K 1.9MM
Posts: 6,798
My prediction: they will change the name!

Boom? Really? That doesn't even work for 'sonic boom' (unless they eliminate it) especially once the complaints start pouring in.

Boom? Really?



Reminds of Phil Hendrie's "Plane Go Boom" bit.

Last edited by narvik; Mar 21, 2016 at 5:09 pm
narvik is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2016 | 2:50 pm
  #9  
Original Poster
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Programs: QRPC Platinum, KFEG
Posts: 1,014
Originally Posted by gingeola
Good luck to them, they're going to need billions $
http://techcrunch.com/2016/03/23/boo...l-with-virgin/

Not exactly the same but still interesting development

Boom is announcing today that Richard Bransons Virgin Group has optioned ten planes, in a deal ultimately valued at about $2 billion dollars. Boom also says theyve optioned 15 additional planes to a European carrier that it declined to name, bringing the total value of the optioned planes up to $5 billion.

Now, this doesnt mean that Virgin has bought the planes its a bit too early for that. Theyve signed a letter of intent, meaning that, having seen the nitty-gritty specs of the plane and the companys plans for moving forward, they intend to buy 10 planes if everything comes together as planned.

But it also looks like Virgin is going to help make that happen: Boom founder Blake Scholl tells me that Virgin Galactics space division, The Spaceship Company, has committed to helping build and test the planes, including helping with the supersonic testing when the time comes.
AAtticus is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2016 | 10:45 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: HEL
Programs: AY+ Gold, SK EBS
Posts: 191
Looks like this thread could be a bit less OT than expected, if this Guardian quote means what I think it does:

"As well as partnering with Virgin, Scholl said he has also signed a letter of intent with an major London-based airline, which wants to buy $2bn worth of his jets."

http://www.theguardian.com/business/...business-class
Chokkoubin is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2016 | 11:30 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 115
Just cant see it happening. Never mind that the numbers don't add up, and not even close, until someone finds a way of eradicating the sonic boom, there wont be any commercial supersonic flight. Shame.
enjoyingit is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2016 | 1:28 pm
  #12  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,444
Originally Posted by enjoyingit
until someone finds a way of eradicating the sonic boom, there wont be any commercial supersonic flight. Shame.
Says you?
LondonElite is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2016 | 1:37 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,503
Originally Posted by Chokkoubin
Looks like this thread could be a bit less OT than expected, if this Guardian quote means what I think it does:

"As well as partnering with Virgin, Scholl said he has also signed a letter of intent with an major London-based airline, which wants to buy $2bn worth of his jets."

http://www.theguardian.com/business/...business-class
I read that too and very briefly wondered if it was BA. But there are so many reasons why BA wouldn't go for this kind of thing right now, in terms of commercial viability, risk, etc, I can't believe it's BA.

But if not BA (nor Virgin who are already mentioned), which other "major London-based airline" would it be?
London_traveller is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2016 | 1:37 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Hague, NL
Programs: GMLFL, Life 2.0 - Mucci Premiere Classe & des Chevaliers Toulousiens
Posts: 22,911
Originally Posted by LondonElite
Says you?
And some others...

http://www.airspacemag.com/flight-to...952125/?no-ist

However (it is a really cute video)...


More info

Last edited by henkybaby; Mar 24, 2016 at 1:44 pm
henkybaby is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2016 | 2:15 pm
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,444
But let's get real for a moment. The reason Concorde was grounded had pretty much nothing to do with sonic boom issues. Flying Europe-US east coast or US west coast-Asia gateways the sonic boom is a complete irrelevance, and that's where much of the money is.
LondonElite is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.