Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Will the new premier qualifying requirements spawn Dollar Runs?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Will the new premier qualifying requirements spawn Dollar Runs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 4:50 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,273
Will the new premier qualifying requirements spawn Dollar Runs?

Since the challenge will be to spend enough money to meet your premier level will we now see dollar runs?

I predict the unit of measure will not be miles per cents but dollars per minute (DPM) since you want to just spend the money quickly.

I further predict, Bakersfield, CA, will be very popular and no one will Bakersfield will know why ...

Last edited by inpd; Aug 5, 2013 at 4:58 pm
inpd is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 5:52 pm
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Ummm...no.

People who want to spend the $10K will simply do it naturally. Most others who want to skip the PQDs will use a Chase co-branded CC and get around the rules.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 5:57 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,191
Only for the foolish
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 5:59 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: UA 1K 1MM
Posts: 455
Ummm, yes.

Maybe not many, and maybe not every year.

I plan to make 1K again next year. I will fly my same pattern of flights, always looking for the cheapest, best flights I can find on United.

Come the end of the year, if I have made the PQS requirement, but am a little short on PQD, I can definitely see spending a little more money to reach my goal.
demosthenes1 is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 6:00 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 8,634
One would be much better off up-faring throughout the rest of the year and enjoying higher upgrade priorities, easier SDC, etc.
mgcsinc is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 6:39 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 697
Originally Posted by mgcsinc
One would be much better off up-faring throughout the rest of the year and enjoying higher upgrade priorities, easier SDC, etc.
This is true, but if you can't plan the full year then you might end up a little short towards the end. If you travel for work it might not be possible to buy higher fares once you realize that you are going to be short. I think this would apply to a very small minority, but probably some.
PHLyer82 is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 6:42 pm
  #7  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited30 Nights1M
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 68,738
I do figure a few of my flights next year should be easier upgrades as I will likely buy a B or M fare or two to insulate myself from any of the incredibly competent UA IT team's glitches in displaying/crediting PQD... Sigh.
exerda is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 6:55 pm
  #8  
5M100 Countries Visited10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 6,288
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
Only for the foolish
Indeed. If sufficient numbers are qualifying for GOLD or higher then expect to see the spend requirement climb each year until the number of elites is pruned.

There will be no way to MR the dollar spend in the final analysis.
LaserSailor is online now  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 7:00 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: between SFO & SJC
Programs: UA 1MM (and no longer flying much)
Posts: 777
I wonder if $misek's contract includes bonuses based on quarterly earnings. If so, I wouldn't be surprised to see "Double PQD" promotions if it looks like he'll be falling a bit short of those earnings targets. And that would in turn drive Dollar Runs. (though far less than MRs in response to DEQM in the past).
endrond is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 7:13 pm
  #10  
20 Countries Visited1M10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: PEK & MKE
Programs: Amex-gold, Hainan-gold, Mrt-LT Titanium
Posts: 1,377
Originally Posted by exerda
I do figure a few of my flights next year should be easier upgrades as I will likely buy a B or M fare or two to insulate myself from any of the incredibly competent UA IT team's glitches in displaying/crediting PQD... Sigh.
What could glitch on a B or M fare on PQD ??
Jiatong is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 7:33 pm
  #11  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited30 Nights1M
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 68,738
Originally Posted by Jiatong
What could glitch on a B or M fare on PQD ??
With UA's IT, anything is possible.

My point is more that pax who are close to the thresholds should not trust the PQD trackers provided by UA (as historically, PMCO's similar tracking functionality was very glitchy, and PQM tracking today suffers a lot of problems), and further might want to insulate themselves a bit more with a buffer in case UA has a glitch where they incorrectly claw back PQD for whatever IT snafu reason (again, we've seen all sorts of posting problems for PQMs since the merger, so one can only expect PQD will be similar...).
exerda is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 8:03 pm
  #12  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HNL&TYO
Programs: UA1K, AA EXP (UA Status Match)
Posts: 17
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
Only for the foolish
Yes, status is not worth chasing as much anymore.
PMUAflyer is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 8:54 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,421
Originally Posted by PMUAflyer
Yes, status is not worth chasing as much anymore.
That is obviously a blanket statement.

A key benefit, CPUs, are not equally distributed. As a resident of a leisure destination who can pretty much plan travel to maximize chances of upgrades, mostly on routes that have a lot of upgrades available, status is valuable to me. I also like the RPUs/GPUs.

If I didn't have flexibility and travelled out of a home airport (or via one) with a lot of Premiers, your statement would fit me better.

The spend requirement for a 1K is actually minimal for most who actually fly that many miles, IMHO. Mileage runs probably won't be necessary for most (again IMHO)...
IAH-OIL-TRASH is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 9:11 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Splitting time between small towns in NorCal and Wydaho
Programs: Amethyst Premier Plutonium Medallion
Posts: 21,026
i recently considered this possible phenomenon myself, and find it unlikely that it will materialize. for instance DL already has this requirement and you dont see postings in the MR deals forum advertising the PQD earning figures for DL fares.

my guess is that MRs will decrease dramatically but there will still be a small and vocal contingent that needs them to top off status after upfaring their business travel throughout the year to meet spend requirements but nowhere near meeting mileage requirements for their desired status.

i also expect that if UA and others continue to offer the ability to purchase premier accelerator and similar products at the same price as they are offered today, and that spend counts for PQD, most would go that route to get what they need.

people do crazy things for status though. i am not immune to being crazy as i will soon fly from CA to ANC by way of NYC for PQMs.
PV_Premier is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 9:30 pm
  #15  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by ddrost1
for instance DL already has this requirement ...
DL's doesn't start until next year, just like UA's.
sbm12 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.