Yup -- 140k RT if flying on partners.
If flying on UA metal, it'll be 57.5k each way saver or 150k each way (!) standard.

 

Thanks for confirming this. Time to move to Miles&Smiles...

 

I was on a DXB-IAD (777) just last week, on which I had a set of 3 E+ seats to myself...so did the person in the set of seats in front of me... and the one in the set of seats behind me.

Great flight...lie flat ghetto style.

 

I'm saying ALL airlines no longer fly routes that are not filled with PAX. Not really a statement on FF miles/awards.....just sayin.

 

Hi everyone, as promised, some updates and clarifications for you:

Hi TravelinSperry, you raise a fundamental question. Frankly, the levels at which we currently offer these awards, particularly in the premium cabins, have not kept up with the increased cost from our partners to United. It’s been several years since we’ve adjusted our award pricing, and in many cases what we’ve been charging for awards has gotten highly out of sync with what it costs United to supply partner award seats to our customers. Being able to book premium-cabin award travel across 30+ MileagePlus partners is of course a strong benefit of the program, and we wanted to maintain access to these itineraries instead of restricting them altogether—an approach other programs have taken.

Hi DWFI, Our existing change process will apply. Changes to awards that require a change in date do not result in a change to the award price. Any other change will require an add/collect in miles and fees for changes or cancellations will still apply as per our existing policies.

Hi mitchmu, the new award pricing takes effect for bookings made on or after Feb 1, 2014 for all future travel dates. If you purchase a ticket now for travel on March 15, and no changes are made to the itinerary, the current pricing will apply.

--

Finally, a note about mixed-carrier Saver Awards. Although there will now be two charts, it will be still be possible to combine United/United Express and MileagePlus partner award flights on the same itinerary. However, the MileagePlus partner award cabin level will need to be lower than that of the United-operated segment(s) in order to take advantage of the United Saver Award price. So, for a US to Europe itinerary where the long-haul segment is in United Global First, the intra-Europe connecting segment would need to be in Business or Economy (as they typically already are) to take advantage of the United Saver Award price. Similarly, for a US to Europe itinerary where the long-haul segment is in United BusinessFirst, the intra-Europe connecting segment would need to be in Economy to take advantage of the United Saver Award price.

Aaron Goldberg
Sr. Manager - Customer Experience Planning
United Airlines

 

+1 --- We think we're more important than we really are.

I saw a statistic not too long ago that the FT type flyer accounts for 4% of airlines passenger base. 96% of airline passengers may have never heard of flyertalk, milepoint, etc.

 

It is unfortunate, but I guess this is just the nature of business when a supplier feels that you don't have any other attractive choices on the open market for their service.

Could a restaurant, grocery store or auto manufacturer get away with treating their clientele like this? The simple answer is no. People would decide that the service no longer has value and look for a better provider.

The trend at United is troubling if you're a frequent or even semi-frequent traveler. Fewer F and E+ seats on planes, credit card holders getting priority access, the much discussed changes in the United Club are all decreases in service. Smisek's mentality is that we will all gripe about the changes, threaten to leave, never fly United again etc., but that ultimately most of us will stay. It's obvious that he believes that with all things being equal (with United's win for the race to the bottom), we won't change to AA or DL, we'll stay loyal to UA.

I'll be leaving, but the transition is going to be tough. I will finish up 2013 as a 1K with 135,000 bis miles. The major downside for me is I have almost 900,000 miles in my MileageMinus account. Pre-booking award trips prior to February 1st will be a challenge and should hopefully save me something, but goodbye to F. I guess the remaining miles will get me through until I have enough miles on the next airline I become a frequent flyer at, so that I can again begin to book award travel again.

It's great to feel loved. Thanks Jeff.

 

I really don't mind the increase in the price of F awards. I always thought it was ridiculous that I'd get a J award for 140k and the F award was only 180k or so. That just never made sense and I can see why the airline needs to fix it.

What gets my goat here is the increased price to fly partners. UA doesn't fly everywhere. And even when they DO fly, they may not have many seats. Case in point is just yesterday I booked J seats for the wife and her friend to visit India. There was absolutely no saver availability whatsoever on United metal, so they're going on Lufthansa. Now United is not only withholding inventory from me, they're penalizing me for it.


The only small silver lining I can see here is that if UA metal J awards are more expensive, it gets easier to use GPUs.

I would also be less upset if the corresponding price increase on J saver awards led to more saver award inventory being opened up.

 

UA is following the Halloween spirit by scaring everyone away

This deval sucks most for me because my biggest use is US-HKG, so this new world of 80K J / 130K F on partner really forces me to stick with UA metal, no matter how unattractive that option is.

But I knew the musical chairs had to end. 70K on LH F / NH F is just WAAAAAY too good to be true.

Now let's see what the devaluation would look like when US/AA merger closes.

 

Thanks for the clarification. This at least makes the UA GF awards still useful.

 

Aaron,

I think you guys made the right move conceptually, but the proof will be in the execution of how you treat your most loyal, revenue generating passengers. UA is forcing a major concession on part of your passenger base, I just hope you don't forget to treat your revenue generating passengers with kid gloves.

 

Thanks for the clarification Aaron.

 

Good to have confirmation of that--it only makes sense. However, how easy will this be to select when booking online? Will the award search engine have separate columns now for "United Saver (with partner flights)" and "Star Alliance Saver" (or something to that effect)? Or will we need to call to book? Or do something convoluted like a multi-destination search (buggy) or book at the higher rate, then do a change to the award (for those eligible for free changes) to downgrade the partner flights and get a mileage refund?

This is most important on BusinessFirst awards connecting to *A partners, since as you say a saver GlobalFirst award is going to already work out correctly in most cases.

 

Au contraire, elites are more likely to be savvy about the best redemption values - that is to use miles for international C/F travel and often on partners that provide better in-flight experience than UA,AA,DL. The millions of non-elites who use mileage cards (including my parents) redeem for North America travel and international economy class - this is bourne out by published statistics. The fact that a few thousand non-elite churners are able to game the system to leverage signup bonuses for C/F international travel does not change the fundamental underpinnings of how these programs operate.

 

Better book your travel today for next summer. If those flights were hard to find last week, they are going to be impossible to find next week.