Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Question: Feedback on your Rapidair experiences

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Question: Feedback on your Rapidair experiences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2009 | 4:40 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto (YYZ)
Posts: 6,279
Originally Posted by Simon
From the passenger's perspective, they should pay $50 r/t and get rare roast beef with horseradish carved at their seat, but I digress.
Speaking of roast beef... on my last PORTER flight I got a roast-beef sandwich with a glass of wine and I paid $59 each way!!

Originally Posted by Simon
...which doesn't happen.
It's never happened? EVER? So they say, you think they're going to say otherwise?
imverge is offline  
Old May 29, 2009 | 4:43 pm
  #32  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto YYZ UA-1K 1MM,QFgold
Programs: Royal Ambassador/ SPG Platinum 75/Marriott gold
Posts: 14,283
Originally Posted by Seat13F_AC_CRJ
What is "bag drop"?
--
13F
its what is happening under my eyes.

Andrew, somehow it would be nice to be able to upgrade on these flights. Do like United give us 500 mile upgrade certificates or some type of regional upgrade certs. Just 2 SSWU are not enough for most elites let alone 4 for SE's
why fly is offline  
Old May 29, 2009 | 5:11 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Closer to YTZ
Programs: Fairmont Platinum | AC Gate Lice Status | VIPorter
Posts: 2,554
Originally Posted by Tangoer
At YYZ T1 beside Gate 120 wasn't there a AC cust. service desk named Rapidair? It's since been replaced by a bar, the eponymous Bar 120.

<Insert commentary about the apparent state of AC cust. service?? Pax can now drown their delay sorrows at the bar? >
Please, does anyone know what happend to this AC desk?
Tangoer is offline  
Old May 29, 2009 | 5:27 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 372
Originally Posted by Andrew Yiu
Thanks for your suggestions, to address your #2:

I've posted this numerous times, we don't cancel flights purely due to low loads on day of departure. Not sure what your definition of 'often' is, I just looked at the whole month of May and we barely had 10 cancellations on the YYZ/YUL market out of almost 1200 flights that we operated on this market and they were all due to mechanical. So there really isn't anything to admit when it's not true?
I've been flying in the front seats of these things for 35 years and totally concur. Andrew is 100% correct.
Also Andrew why have we never used "Rocky Mountain Rapidair" as a tagline out west.
acplt is offline  
Old May 29, 2009 | 6:53 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Closer to YTZ
Programs: Fairmont Platinum | AC Gate Lice Status | VIPorter
Posts: 2,554
Most of the replies suggest "become more like porter".

Every day I see the Porter shuttle bus near the downtown Fairmont. Also hard to miss and also stopping at the hotel is the yellow-coloured Airport Express coach that runs every 20min. The bus appears to offer Wi-Fi too.


Here's a radical idea: offer a free Rapidair shuttle 'luxury' coach for moving downtown people to/from YYZ airport.

Or would this simply highlight the fact of the porter bus taking only 10min to reach YTZ, vs. 40+ min to YYZ...?

If there is Wi-Fi on the bus it would be a plus. Of course some people would always prefer cab/limo to YYZ esp. if their workplace is paying for it and time is important.

Tough call but I was thinking along the lines of: If you can't beat 'em then join 'em.
Tangoer is offline  
Old May 29, 2009 | 7:37 pm
  #36  
50 Countries Visited80 Nights5M20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E75K 2MM * DL MM * HH Diamond * Marriott Lifetime Titanium * Queen's '92
Posts: 5,957
Originally Posted by imverge
It's never happened? EVER? So they say, you think they're going to say otherwise?
"They" ?!

How much time have you spent in an Air Canada flight control and planning centre?

Simon
Simon is offline  
Old May 29, 2009 | 8:41 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: YTZ
Programs: AC SE, Hyatt Platinum, SPG Gold, Priority Club Gold
Posts: 487
Originally Posted by Andrew Yiu
Without going into the complicated details of aircraft scheduling - often in weather situation, each airline has to reduce certain # of flights, so in AC's case, Rapidair has the most number of frequencies hence the customer impact is less than on a route with fewer frequencies because passengers can be easily reprotected on earlier/later flights. (i.e. it doesn't make sense to cancel YYZ-LHR or YYZ-LAS or LAX etc) Rapidair flights are often tied into a line of other flying throughout the day (they're not dedicated aircrafts), so when an aircraft goes mechanical elsewhere in the system, unfortunately it's going to have downline effect.
I don't disagree with you, however, I did simply want to point out that the benefit of Rapidair is greatly reduced when a plane scheduled for YOW-YYZ is taken and used for YOW-YEG while forcing a plane full of pax to sit around waiting for another 1+ hours for the plane that was originally scheduled to fly YOW-YEG arrives (not sure where it was coming in from). The weather that day was horrendous (it was sometime in Jan or Feb) and I have no idea how late the YOW-YEG flight was by the time they finally sent it on it's way, but it is frustrating to see it happen. (I can likely find the exact day this occured if you don't believe me.)

That was also why I suggested trying to make the rapidair flights more dedicated as much as possible ... to try and reduce downline effects. I fly YOW-YYZ almost every week, and I do tend to stick with AC because most of these flights are coming in from Toronto and doing a quick turn. The flights rarely depart as scheduled, but usually depart within 5-15 mins of scheduled (Porter is almost always right on time if not a few minutes early). However, when the weather turns for the worse, I know that AC is going to get out. (Westjet and Porter tend to have way more red per flight on the Ottawa departure boards then AC ever does.)
lynchpin_yyz is offline  
Old May 29, 2009 | 9:49 pm
  #38  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto YYZ UA-1K 1MM,QFgold
Programs: Royal Ambassador/ SPG Platinum 75/Marriott gold
Posts: 14,283
Originally Posted by lynchpin_yyz

That was also why I suggested trying to make the rapidair flights more dedicated as much as possible ... to try and reduce downline effects. I fly YOW-YYZ almost every week, and I do tend to stick with AC because most of these flights are coming in from Toronto and doing a quick turn. The flights rarely depart as scheduled, but usually depart within 5-15 mins of scheduled (Porter is almost always right on time if not a few minutes early). However, when the weather turns for the worse, I know that AC is going to get out. (Westjet and Porter tend to have way more red per flight on the Ottawa departure boards then AC ever does.)
Well take a look at this "new thread? not sure why it was not posted in this thread but Porters "on-time" performance is BAD..

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-c...l#post11827033
why fly is offline  
Old May 29, 2009 | 9:59 pm
  #39  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: YQB
Programs: AC*SE/2.1MM, Flying Blue Explorer, BA Executive Club Blue, AAdvantage Basic, ANA MC
Posts: 2,555
Originally Posted by why fly
Well take a look at this "new thread? not sure why it was not posted in this thread but Porters "on-time" performance is BAD..

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-c...l#post11827033
I didn't want AY's Rapidair question and FTers' replies to get bogged down in a debate about PD OTP. My bad if this was wrong thing to do.

Last edited by Simon; May 30, 2009 at 7:10 am Reason: added missing bracket
NordsFan is offline  
Old May 29, 2009 | 10:46 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto (YYZ)
Posts: 6,279
Originally Posted by why fly
Well take a look at this "new thread? not sure why it was not posted in this thread but Porters "on-time" performance is BAD..

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-c...l#post11827033
Well when the airport is fogged in that's what happens. DELAYS. Downtown T.O. experienced major fog yesterday and heavy rain at times.

But at-least pax get free use of the lounge while they are waiting in Toronto.
imverge is offline  
Old May 29, 2009 | 10:49 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto (YYZ)
Posts: 6,279
Originally Posted by Simon
"They" ?!

How much time have you spent in an Air Canada flight control and planning centre?

Simon
Never have never will, I'll leave that to the experts over at AC. I mean they are a hair away from another bankruptcy filing.

I repeat what I said before, from a pax perspective that's the way it seems.

Last edited by imverge; May 29, 2009 at 11:10 pm
imverge is offline  
Old May 30, 2009 | 12:15 am
  #42  
10 Countries Visited500k15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: YOW
Programs: AC E75K *G
Posts: 7,152
Originally Posted by imverge
Never have never will, I'll leave that to the experts over at AC. I mean they are a hair away from another bankruptcy filing.

I repeat what I said before, from a pax perspective that's the way it seems.
Only if the pax is completely ignorant.

The OP was looking for informed suggestions. I'm sure they are well aware of the many stupid things people think they know about airlines.
zorn is offline  
Old May 30, 2009 | 3:31 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM, Asia Miles, SPG Gold (life), HH Gold, Golden Circle Jade
Posts: 1,068
Originally Posted by lynchpin_yyz
That was also why I suggested trying to make the rapidair flights more dedicated as much as possible ... to try and reduce downline effects. I fly YOW-YYZ almost every week, and I do tend to stick with AC because most of these flights are coming in from Toronto and doing a quick turn. The flights rarely depart as scheduled, but usually depart within 5-15 mins of scheduled (Porter is almost always right on time if not a few minutes early). However, when the weather turns for the worse, I know that AC is going to get out. (Westjet and Porter tend to have way more red per flight on the Ottawa departure boards then AC ever does.)
This sounds like a "don't inconvenience me to avoid inconveniencing to someone else" argument. Not sure that will really apply in this thread. At times they'll have to make a decision and that's the way it goes. United once had me on an 8 hour mechanical delay to Beijing on a 3-day trip. That's one full day lost. Makes an hour or two delay on a short-haul look quite tolerable. It could be worse, you could be stuck on the 401 + DVP in stop-and-go.
pmax is offline  
Old May 30, 2009 | 7:14 am
  #44  
50 Countries Visited80 Nights5M20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E75K 2MM * DL MM * HH Diamond * Marriott Lifetime Titanium * Queen's '92
Posts: 5,957
Originally Posted by imverge
I repeat what I said before, from a pax perspective that's the way it seems.
My bet is most "pax" don't spend time thinking about such things, unless they are of a conspiratorial bent.

I guess it would be better to have 50 ready to go, crew-filled planes just sitting around on the ground in case one goes mechanical to ensure that armchair airline experts don't walk around the departure lounge talking about how airline X would never cancel a flight because of low loads, whereas it's an AC specialty, just in case this happened to happen.

Last edited by Simon; May 30, 2009 at 7:51 am
Simon is offline  
Old May 30, 2009 | 8:10 am
  #45  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: YTZ
Programs: AC SE, Hyatt Platinum, SPG Gold, Priority Club Gold
Posts: 487
Originally Posted by pmax
This sounds like a "don't inconvenience me to avoid inconveniencing to someone else" argument. Not sure that will really apply in this thread. At times they'll have to make a decision and that's the way it goes. United once had me on an 8 hour mechanical delay to Beijing on a 3-day trip. That's one full day lost. Makes an hour or two delay on a short-haul look quite tolerable. It could be worse, you could be stuck on the 401 + DVP in stop-and-go.
I can't fault them for the decision ... and I was in the lounge so I couldn't complain all that much. It probably did make the most sense at the time... but if the idea of rapidair is to have hourly or better service on a 1-hour flight, sending rapidair planes to other destinations while passengers sit around wondering why their flight keeps getting delayed does take away from the rapidair experience (the passangers at the gate had no idea what was happening).

I didn't mean for the post to come across as a complaint, but more something to consider if you're trying to build (or rebuild) a rapidair brand.
lynchpin_yyz is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.