LAST CHANCE: Who Will Be The Next FlyerTalk Member To Fly Free To Amsterdam?
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:24 pm
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Programs: Statusless and proud
Posts: 7,667
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:24 pm
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Programs: Statusless and proud
Posts: 7,667
Happy Post 3000 to Me!!!!!!
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:25 pm
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area
Programs: UA, Marriott, WN
Posts: 3,864
Benguela -12.58 13.408 +01:00
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:25 pm
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Programs: Statusless and proud
Posts: 7,667
Now to get to 3,000 in this thread....
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:25 pm
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Silver IHG Platinum
Posts: 3,736
39-13-304. Aggravated kidnapping.
(a) Aggravated kidnapping is false imprisonment, as defined in 39-13-302, committed:
(1) To facilitate the commission of any felony or flight thereafter;
(2) To interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function;
(3) With the intent to inflict serious bodily injury on or to terrorize the victim or another;
(4) Where the victim suffers bodily injury; or
(5) While the defendant is in possession of a deadly weapon or threatens the use of a deadly weapon.
(b) (1) Aggravated kidnapping is a Class B felony.
(2) If the offender voluntarily releases the victim alive or voluntarily provides information leading to the victim's safe release, such actions shall be considered by the court as a mitigating factor at the time of sentencing.
[Acts 1989, ch. 591, 1; T.C.A., 39-13-301; Acts 1990, ch. 982, 1.]
(a) Aggravated kidnapping is false imprisonment, as defined in 39-13-302, committed:
(1) To facilitate the commission of any felony or flight thereafter;
(2) To interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function;
(3) With the intent to inflict serious bodily injury on or to terrorize the victim or another;
(4) Where the victim suffers bodily injury; or
(5) While the defendant is in possession of a deadly weapon or threatens the use of a deadly weapon.
(b) (1) Aggravated kidnapping is a Class B felony.
(2) If the offender voluntarily releases the victim alive or voluntarily provides information leading to the victim's safe release, such actions shall be considered by the court as a mitigating factor at the time of sentencing.
[Acts 1989, ch. 591, 1; T.C.A., 39-13-301; Acts 1990, ch. 982, 1.]
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:25 pm
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Programs: Statusless and proud
Posts: 7,667
posting to 3000!
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:26 pm
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area
Programs: UA, Marriott, WN
Posts: 3,864
Sumbe -11.2 13.833 +01:00
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:26 pm
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: UA Pleb, HH Gold, PWP General Secretary
Posts: 23,199
32334 777-212/ER Singapore Airlines 20/06/2002 9V-SRL Active
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:26 pm
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nomad, Chicago
Programs: UAL 1K, Million Miler
Posts: 1,884
The Dutch newspaper de Volkskrant reports that city of Amsterdam is planning to drastically change the character of its famous Red Light district by upgrading the neighbourhood and banning window prostitution. Today Amsterdams Alderman for Finance Lodewijk Asscher will present the Coalition Project 1012, which he describes as a large-scale and drastic change in function of the entrance to the capital city.
The project will entail close co-operation between private enterprise, police, the tax authorities and the municipality in order to spruce up the citys dismal red carpet. Mr Asscher said: The days that riff-raff have been allowed to control the most beautiful section of the citys historic centre are over.
De Volkskrant writes that private investors will spend hundreds of million of euros to upgrade the neighbourhood. The number of window prostitutes and facilities for drug addicts will be reduced. In response to a question whether the neighbourhood will become boring, Mr Asscher said: No, of course not. Were choosing chique and louche. Exciting, but bona fide.
The project will entail close co-operation between private enterprise, police, the tax authorities and the municipality in order to spruce up the citys dismal red carpet. Mr Asscher said: The days that riff-raff have been allowed to control the most beautiful section of the citys historic centre are over.
De Volkskrant writes that private investors will spend hundreds of million of euros to upgrade the neighbourhood. The number of window prostitutes and facilities for drug addicts will be reduced. In response to a question whether the neighbourhood will become boring, Mr Asscher said: No, of course not. Were choosing chique and louche. Exciting, but bona fide.
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:26 pm
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Silver IHG Platinum
Posts: 3,736
39-13-305. Especially aggravated kidnapping.
(a) Especially aggravated kidnapping is false imprisonment, as defined in 39-13-302:
(1) Accomplished with a deadly weapon or by display of any article used or fashioned to lead the victim to reasonably believe it to be a deadly weapon;
(2) Where the victim was under the age of thirteen (13) at the time of the removal or confinement;
(3) Committed to hold the victim for ransom or reward, or as a shield or hostage; or
(4) Where the victim suffers serious bodily injury.
(b) (1) Especially aggravated kidnapping is a Class A felony.
(2) If the offender voluntarily releases the victim alive or voluntarily provides information leading to the victim's safe release, such actions shall be considered by the court as a mitigating factor at the time of sentencing.
[Acts 1990, ch. 982, 1.]
(a) Especially aggravated kidnapping is false imprisonment, as defined in 39-13-302:
(1) Accomplished with a deadly weapon or by display of any article used or fashioned to lead the victim to reasonably believe it to be a deadly weapon;
(2) Where the victim was under the age of thirteen (13) at the time of the removal or confinement;
(3) Committed to hold the victim for ransom or reward, or as a shield or hostage; or
(4) Where the victim suffers serious bodily injury.
(b) (1) Especially aggravated kidnapping is a Class A felony.
(2) If the offender voluntarily releases the victim alive or voluntarily provides information leading to the victim's safe release, such actions shall be considered by the court as a mitigating factor at the time of sentencing.
[Acts 1990, ch. 982, 1.]
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:26 pm
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa
Programs: NW Platinum, NW Gold for '09
Posts: 1,267
2. apocrine sudoriferous (sweat) glands
found in limited areas---axillary (armpits) and anogenital regions
contains lots of lipids and proteins---responsible for B.O.
found in limited areas---axillary (armpits) and anogenital regions
contains lots of lipids and proteins---responsible for B.O.
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:26 pm
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Programs: Statusless and proud
Posts: 7,667
Maybe I'll try and get to 3rd place before taking a break. I started the day in 6th.
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:26 pm
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: UA Pleb, HH Gold, PWP General Secretary
Posts: 23,199
32335 777-212/ER Singapore Airlines 16/08/2002 9V-SVJ Active
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:26 pm
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area
Programs: UA, Marriott, WN
Posts: 3,864
Luanda -8.838 13.234 +01:00
Nov 10, 2008 | 7:26 pm
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Silver IHG Platinum
Posts: 3,736
39-13-306. Custodial interference.
(a) It is the offense of custodial interference for a natural or adoptive parent, step-parent, grandparent, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, niece, or nephew of a child younger than eighteen (18) years of age to:
(1) Remove the child from this state knowing that the removal violates a child custody determination as defined in 36-6-205(3), the rightful custody of a mother as defined in 36-2-303, or a temporary or permanent judgment or court order regarding the custody or care of the child;
(2) Detain the child within this state or remove the child from this state after the expiration of the noncustodial natural or adoptive parent or guardian's lawful period of visitation, with the intent to violate the rightful custody of a mother as defined in 36-2-303, or a temporary or permanent judgment or a court order regarding the custody or care of the child;
(3) Harbor or hide the child within or outside this state, knowing that possession of the child was unlawfully obtained by another person in violation of the rightful custody of a mother as defined in 36-2-303, or a temporary or permanent judgment or a court order; or
(4) Act as an accessory to any act prohibited by this section.
(b) It is also the offense of custodial interference for a natural or adoptive parent, step-parent, grandparent, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, niece, or nephew of an incompetent person to:
(1) Remove the incompetent person from this state knowing that the removal violates a temporary or permanent judgment or a court order regarding the custody or care of the incompetent person;
(2) Harbor or hide the incompetent person within or outside this state, knowing that possession of the incompetent person was unlawfully obtained by another person in violation of a temporary or permanent judgment or a court order; or
(3) Act as an accessory to any act prohibited by this section.
(c) It is a defense to custodial interference:
(1) That the person who removed the child or incompetent person reasonably believed that, at the time the child or incompetent was removed, the failure to remove the child or incompetent person would have resulted in a clear and present danger to the health, safety, or welfare of the child or incompetent person; or
(2) That the individual detained or moved in contravention of the rightful custody of a mother as defined in 36-2-303, or of the order of custody or care, was returned by the defendant voluntarily and before arrest or the issuance of a warrant for arrest.
(d) If conduct that is in violation of this section is also a violation of 39-13-304 or 39-13-305(a)(1), (a)(3), or (a)(4), the offense may be prosecuted under any of the applicable statutes.
(e) Custodial interference is a Class E felony, unless the person taken from lawful custody is returned voluntarily by the defendant, in which case custodial interference is a Class A misdemeanor.
[Acts 1989, ch. 591, 1; T.C.A., 39-13-304; Acts 1990, ch. 982, 1; 2004, ch. 834, 1.]
(a) It is the offense of custodial interference for a natural or adoptive parent, step-parent, grandparent, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, niece, or nephew of a child younger than eighteen (18) years of age to:
(1) Remove the child from this state knowing that the removal violates a child custody determination as defined in 36-6-205(3), the rightful custody of a mother as defined in 36-2-303, or a temporary or permanent judgment or court order regarding the custody or care of the child;
(2) Detain the child within this state or remove the child from this state after the expiration of the noncustodial natural or adoptive parent or guardian's lawful period of visitation, with the intent to violate the rightful custody of a mother as defined in 36-2-303, or a temporary or permanent judgment or a court order regarding the custody or care of the child;
(3) Harbor or hide the child within or outside this state, knowing that possession of the child was unlawfully obtained by another person in violation of the rightful custody of a mother as defined in 36-2-303, or a temporary or permanent judgment or a court order; or
(4) Act as an accessory to any act prohibited by this section.
(b) It is also the offense of custodial interference for a natural or adoptive parent, step-parent, grandparent, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, niece, or nephew of an incompetent person to:
(1) Remove the incompetent person from this state knowing that the removal violates a temporary or permanent judgment or a court order regarding the custody or care of the incompetent person;
(2) Harbor or hide the incompetent person within or outside this state, knowing that possession of the incompetent person was unlawfully obtained by another person in violation of a temporary or permanent judgment or a court order; or
(3) Act as an accessory to any act prohibited by this section.
(c) It is a defense to custodial interference:
(1) That the person who removed the child or incompetent person reasonably believed that, at the time the child or incompetent was removed, the failure to remove the child or incompetent person would have resulted in a clear and present danger to the health, safety, or welfare of the child or incompetent person; or
(2) That the individual detained or moved in contravention of the rightful custody of a mother as defined in 36-2-303, or of the order of custody or care, was returned by the defendant voluntarily and before arrest or the issuance of a warrant for arrest.
(d) If conduct that is in violation of this section is also a violation of 39-13-304 or 39-13-305(a)(1), (a)(3), or (a)(4), the offense may be prosecuted under any of the applicable statutes.
(e) Custodial interference is a Class E felony, unless the person taken from lawful custody is returned voluntarily by the defendant, in which case custodial interference is a Class A misdemeanor.
[Acts 1989, ch. 591, 1; T.C.A., 39-13-304; Acts 1990, ch. 982, 1; 2004, ch. 834, 1.]