Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > MilesBuzz
Reload this Page >

After 40 years of "buying Boeing" Qantas to spend huge with Airbus

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

After 40 years of "buying Boeing" Qantas to spend huge with Airbus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2000 | 11:25 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB Silver going for Gold
Posts: 22,047
Originally posted by NYC1:
SYD-JFK can be done on the "777-200 Longer Range".

It has a maximum range of 8860 nautical miles (the Airbus 340-500's is 8500 nautical miles).

SYD-JFK is 8640 nautical miles.
PER-LHR is 7798 nautical miles.

It can be done but for some reason it is not.
One good reason. Both of the aircraft cited have yet to fly!
YVR Cockroach is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2000 | 11:29 pm
  #17  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,333
NYC1. With the headwind and a full load? Like to see that. And I would not book on the maiden flight is my free advice.

Terenz, I do not recall that at all.

Certainly do remember the LHR-PER made news, as that itself was rather a major feat. No-one flies Europe to SIN/HGK/BKK etc, which are many hours short of SYD so there is no way ANY existing plane will make it non-stop to SYD. (IMHO!)

------------------
~ Glen ~
ozstamps is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2000 | 11:32 pm
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 15,476
Oz,

Wow, a whole inch of legroom. 10 years ago Qantas had two more inches than they do today. One step forward, two back.

BTW, as you seem so in love with this thing, does that mean that you'll stop flying United????
hfly is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2000 | 11:52 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB Silver going for Gold
Posts: 22,047
Originally posted by ozstamps:
No-one flies Europe to SIN/HGK/BKK etc,[/b] which are many hours short of SYD so there is no way ANY existing plane will make it non-stop to SYD. (IMHO!)
No one (airline) flies non-stop Europe to SIN/HKG/BKK? Certainly news to me. I flew BA LHR-BKK non-stop a few years back.
YVR Cockroach is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2000 | 12:11 am
  #20  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,333
Terenz .. I stand corrected. Was still typing that 11.29 post when you did the 11.22 one with this hotlink!

http://www.qantas.com.au/company/history/dawn/qa17.html

Qantas ran that record breaking "bare back" flight LHR-SYD. 20 hours non-stop. Your memory is excellent - I owe you a beer as penance if we do cross paths in Seattle next week! And re the Europe-Asia flights, had not edited completely as had a phone call - of course pretty well ALL flights SIN/BKK/HGK to Europe are non stop and have been for many years. That is optimum range for a 747. SYD is however another 8-9 hours or so flying to many of those ports. Time for my tablet now.

------------------
~ Glen ~



[This message has been edited by ozstamps (edited 11-02-2000).]
ozstamps is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2000 | 9:19 am
  #21  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: NYC -- UA 1K; SPG Platinum; HH Diamond.
Posts: 3,041
Originally posted by ozstamps:
NYC1With the headwind and a full load? Like to see that. And I would not book on the maiden flight is my free advice.
Not even if they had a special mileage bonus?
NYC1 is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2000 | 5:33 pm
  #22  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,333
Not even if they offered quadruple miles!

NYC-SYD non-stop will be really pushing the envelope in a full laden 777 going east into the headwind all the way IMHO. I guess that would be a 17 hour type flight? Over millions of acres of OCEAN for most of the journey, and most particularly, the final half. No thanks! I like adventure, but that one is too hard to get excited about until the reliabilty is well proven.

But, I guess whomever flew the first non-stop USA-SYD on a 747 might have had the same doubts. Anyone recall when that flight was first taken, and which airline?

------------------
~ Glen ~

[This message has been edited by ozstamps (edited 11-02-2000).]
ozstamps is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2000 | 5:53 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Bryn Mawr PA & Wailea HI
Posts: 15,726
Somehow I just cannot get too excited today (2 Nov 2000) as the first delivery date appears to be mid-2006 per the article. FWIW they easily could of promised "6 nice more inches" of hip room and/or leg room. That far down the road means absolutely nothing today. Actually I wonder how many of today's airlines will be operating under their current name by mid-2006.
MisterNice is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2000 | 6:36 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon; seat 3A
Programs: UA 1K 2021-22-23-24;Formerly a longtime UA Premier Exec; NW silver (legacy), Alaska Gold (way back)
Posts: 2,318
Also, a long flight is not necessarily the great circle route. The airline needs permission to overfly the nations along the way. A LHR-SYD great circle route overflies some lively places, including the Russia-China border and a few of the former Soviet "republics." If I were on that plane and it had the fuel, I would be more comfortable going the long away around some of those spots.

------------------
"If you want to win the game, write the rules."
Law Lord is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.